AI Search Content Visibility Report | Collaboration Software
Based on an analysis of citations across major AI engines, we examined which domains, brands, and content formats are cited most when answering queries about collaboration and project management software.
Top Cited Domains in Collaboration Software
Monday.com and Asana.com rank as the top two domains by combined citation share both carrying strong position 1 rates, meaning AI engines lead responses with them rather than just mentioning them. YouTube.com retains strong volume but a low position 1 rate. Reddit.com shows a disproportionately high position 1 rate relative to its citation share, making it a go-to first source for social proof queries.
- monday.com5.5%10%
- asana.com*5.0%10%
- youtube.com4.3%2%
- reddit.com3.1%9%
- thedigitalprojectmanager.com2.8%8%
- medium.com1.8%5%
- wrike.com1.5%2%
- project-management.com1.4%7%
- g2.com1.4%7%
Content Formats AI Cites Most
Editorial and blog content accounts for two thirds of all citations reflecting how AI engines favour long-form explanatory content in this space. Listicles and comparison pages capture nearly one in five citations. Brand websites account for just over 3%, confirming AI heavily prefers third-party sources over direct product pages.
- Editorial / Blog66.7%
- Listicle / Comparison17.7%
- Social / Community7.4%
- Brand Website3.3%
- Review Platform2.3%
- News / Media2.2%
- Research / PDF0.4%
Brand Share of Voice
Asana holds the top position, appearing in nearly two thirds of all AI responses in this space. monday.com and Jira form a clear second tier. Linear, a newer entrant outperforms several established names, driven by strong performance in social proof and use-case queries. The gap between the leader tier and challengers is steep.
Measured as the percentage of all AI responses in which a brand appeared at least once.
- Asana61.9%
- monday.com49.4%
- Jira41.5%
- ClickUp39.1%
- Trello32.4%
- Notion21.4%
- Wrike21.1%
- Linear17.1%
- Range15.6%
- Smartsheet12.3%
Brand Visibility by Intent
Asana leads eight of ten intent categories. The exception is social proof, where Linear leads with 31.6% suggesting it has built a strong practitioner reputation despite lower overall share. monday.com flips to first place for integrations queries, where its ecosystem positioning outperforms Asana. Transactional intent shows the highest concentration, with Asana capturing nearly half of all purchase-intent citations.
| Intent | Asana | Monday | Jira | Linear | ClickUp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transactional | 45.7% | 26.7% | — | 22.5% | — |
| Use Case | 35.2% | 6.2% | 5.8% | 30.1% | — |
| Problem Solving | 30.5% | 3.9% | 19.1% | — | — |
| Social Proof | 17.1% | 14.8% | 20.7% | 31.6% | 2.9% |
| Brand Query | 24.9% | 10.8% | 21.5% | 20.4% | — |
| Comparison | 22.2% | 18.4% | 13.8% | 10.5% | — |
| Pricing | 22% | 20.9% | 6.7% | — | 19.4% |
| Integrations | 14.4% | 24.3% | 13.6% | — | 8.7% |
| Recommendation | 15.2% | 14.2% | 11.3% | — | 14.8% |
| Discovery | 15.5% | 9.4% | 12.8% | — | 10.5% |
How Lantern collects this data
Lantern collects millions of prompt responses, citations, and click data from the actual user interfaces of major AI platforms. This gives us one of the largest and most authentic datasets on how AI search engines cite sources and surface brands.
Prompt monitoring
Data collected directly from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and AI Overviews, the same results users see daily.
200m+ data points
Over 200 million analyzed citations, prompts, and responses one of the largest AI search datasets available.
Aggregated and public
Published freely for the GEO and AI search community. All reports are based on aggregated, non-identifiable trends.